Mike,
Things like fill memory are 'blocked up' and are one of the things
that the 'scanloop' option uses to improve performance. It will be
slower with that option disabled.
I suppose you're referring to the option you made me add to the
connection .xml file (Disable ScanLoop for C6000 DVR). Your phrase is not fully
clear for my bad euro-english. With the setting in the .xml file I suppose I
keep scanloop enabled. At the beginning of the phrase you say that scanloop
improves performance. So I understand the 2nd phrase as "It will be slower with
that option (scanloop) disabled, i.e.it will be slower with Disable ScanLoop =
1" Is this correct ? If you want I can make a test next monday trying to remove
the option (or better, setting 'Value="1'").
endianness
I believe that when connecting through the DSK USB port you are using a SD
driver and when you connect with XDS100, you are using a TI driver. It sounds
like a sw problem. If I remember correctly-
DSK w/on board USB emulator, big endian - works
DSK w/on board USB emulator, little endian - works
DSK w/external USB emulator, big endian - works
DSK w/external USB emulator, little endian - works
DSK w/XDS100 emulator, big endian - does not work
DSK w/XDS100 emulator, little endian - works
Do the above accurately reflect the current state??
As usual, you are right. I've not an XDS510 Plus here, and as far as I
know nobody in our company tried to use it with the DSK (I think I'm the
only one that's using the DSK). In any case I have the .ccs here, and I can
also confirm both the DSK USB and the XDS510 Plus use sd.dvr, i.e. a
Spectrum Digital driver.
No way for solving the SW problem and use the XDS100 in big endian ?
And as usual, thank you for your patience and cooperation.
Paolo
