Hi, I'm using TI's C6415 processor, C6400 xds560 board and CCS 2. When I try the RTDX tutorials, I can't enable the RTDX function in CCS. I got the message : "GTI device driver failed to enable RTDX" Has anyone face the similiar problem ? What should I do to correct the problem? The documents avalable on TI's website on RTDX is very limited. Can anybody point out other helpful resources on the topic of RTDX ? Thanks. -- Beh CS :-|| 2002-10-29 |
|
RTDX problem
Started by ●October 29, 2002
Reply by ●June 5, 20032003-06-05
Shyju- > 1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass > it through the break point.(Remember break point halts > the target for the data transfer to the host and refreshing > all the windows related to CCS) > 2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple > code which demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) For reliable high-speed real-time data transfer, suggest to use a DSK board and HPI or other non-JTAG interface. If you are careful you may be able to get fairly fast rates using RTDX + JTAG, but eventually you will hit the additional problem that a breakpoint is going to cause issues with your real-time I/O. For example, if you have an audio or video codec, then a breakpoint will pause the processor and timing/sequence/coordination with the codec could be invalid from that point when you resume. FIFOs, logic, other forms of I/O may encounter the same problem. Breakpoint (chip level) debugging can only take you so far, then you need algorithm level debug :-) Jeff Brower system engineer Signalogic |
Reply by ●June 5, 20032003-06-05
Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... /Regards, P Ligander Shyju wrote: >Hello friends , > I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 and c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described it here. Hope any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... > > I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 from Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the tutorial section of CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either we have to put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform the step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create a Channel for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB and our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting EXE graph and other things while the target is running.. We think the problem is with the 6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the very purpose of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious problem as far as we are concerned.Pls! > give us a clear answer to this . > >The programs we tried are... >Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. > >Doubts are.. >1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target for the data transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) >2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code which demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) > >Best Regards, > >"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, >Jr. > >______________________________________ >Scanned and protected by Email scanner > >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > |
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
Hello friends , I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 and c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described it here. Hope any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 from Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the tutorial section of CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either we have to put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform the step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create a Channel for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB and our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting EXE graph and other things while the target is running.. We think the problem is with the 6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the very purpose of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious problem as far as we are concerned.Pls give us a clear answer to this . The programs we tried are... Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. Doubts are.. 1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target for the data transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) 2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code which demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) Best Regards, "You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, Jr. ______________________________________ Scanned and protected by Email scanner |
|
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
Shyju wrote: >Thanks for the fast response from P Ligander & Jeff Brower >I have tried RTDX in 6416 TEB from TI and also the board we designed using >C6416( Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3).How do I know the core is PG1.1 silicon ? http://focus.ti.com/lit/er/sprz011j/sprz011j.pdf Section 1.2 Revision Identifiaction Also, in CCS setup you should be using "C64xx Rev 1.1 XDS5x0......." /Regards, P Ligander >Pls clarify. The C6x series is more exiting with it's uncaomparable >features. But As a biginner I do have some difficulties in getting alonmg >with C6416. Can any one send me any tutorial/Workshop material/ or any good >pdfs on these. Now I am exploring the examples of the CCS studio. > Thanks once again. Ur suggestions are very important to me... > >Shyju P.V >ERDCI > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "P Ligander" <> >To: "Shyju" <> >Cc: <> >Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:37 AM >Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > > >>Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... >> >>/Regards, P Ligander >> >>Shyju wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hello friends , >>> I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 and >>> >>> >c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described it here. Hope >any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... >>> I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer >>> >>> >version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 from >Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the tutorial section of >CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS >details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either we have to >put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform the >step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create a Channel >for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB and >our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However >these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting EXE graph and >other things while the target is running.. We think the problem is with the >6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the very purpose >of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious problem as far >as we are concerned.Pls! >>> give us a clear answer to this . >>> >>>The programs we tried are... >>>Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. >>> >>>Doubts are.. >>>1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it >>> >>> >through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target for the data >transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) >>>2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code which >>> >>> >demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) >>>Best Regards, >>> >>>"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, >>>Jr. >>> >>> >>> >>>______________________________________ >>>Scanned and protected by Email scanner >>> >>> >>> >>>_____________________________________ >>>Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author >>> >>> >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. >>>_____________________________________ >>>About this discussion group: >>> >>>To Join: Send an email to >>> >>>To Post: Send an email to >>> >>>To Leave: Send an email to >>> >>>Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x >>> >>>Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >>> >>> >>>">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>_____________________________________ >>Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author >> >> >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. >>_____________________________________ >>About this discussion group: >> >>To Join: Send an email to >> >>To Post: Send an email to >> >>To Leave: Send an email to >> >>Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x >> >>Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >> >> >>">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> >> > >______________________________________ >Scanned and protected by Email scanner >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > |
|
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
Thanks for the fast response from P Ligander & Jeff Brower I have tried RTDX in 6416 TEB from TI and also the board we designed using C6416( Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3).How do I know the core is PG1.1 silicon ? Pls clarify. The C6x series is more exiting with it's uncaomparable features. But As a biginner I do have some difficulties in getting alonmg with C6416. Can any one send me any tutorial/Workshop material/ or any good pdfs on these. Now I am exploring the examples of the CCS studio. Thanks once again. Ur suggestions are very important to me... Shyju P.V ERDCI ----- Original Message ----- From: "P Ligander" <> To: "Shyju" <> Cc: <> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:37 AM Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... > > /Regards, P Ligander > > Shyju wrote: > > >Hello friends , > > I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 and c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described it here. Hope any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... > > > > I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 from Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the tutorial section of CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either we have to put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform the step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create a Channel for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB and our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting EXE graph and other things while the target is running.. We think the problem is with the 6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the very purpose of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious problem as far as we are concerned.Pls! > > give us a clear answer to this . > > > >The programs we tried are... > >Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. > > > >Doubts are.. > >1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target for the data transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) > >2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code which demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) > > > >Best Regards, > > > >"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, > >Jr. > > > > > > > >______________________________________ > >Scanned and protected by Email scanner > > > > > > > >_____________________________________ > >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > > >_____________________________________ > >About this discussion group: > > > >To Join: Send an email to > > > >To Post: Send an email to > > > >To Leave: Send an email to > > > >Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > > > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > > > > > >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________ > Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > _____________________________________ > About this discussion group: > > To Join: Send an email to > > To Post: Send an email to > > To Leave: Send an email to > > Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > > Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ______________________________________ Scanned and protected by Email scanner |
|
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
2 ways to identifiy silicon revision - The software way : * If you are using CCS 2.1x, then it is a 1.0x silicon revision * If you are using CCS 2.2x, you have a different driver for v1.0x and v1.1. So as said by Par, depending on which driver works for you, you will now the revision - The hardware way : it is simply written on the DSP The 1st line of the DSP should be something like TMS320C6415GLZ The 2nd line should be D103 - <numbers> This is a 1.03 silicon v1.1 silicon have <letter>11 marking at the start of the 2nd line Jean-Michel MERCIER -- dsp & imaging - www.ateme.com ATEME - 26 Burospace - 91573 BIEVRES > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Par Ligander [mailto:] > Envoy: vendredi 6 juin 2003 08:31 > : Shyju > Cc : ; > Objet : Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > Shyju wrote: > > >Thanks for the fast response from P Ligander & Jeff Brower > >I have tried RTDX in 6416 TEB from TI and also the board we > designed using > >C6416( Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3).How do I know the core is > PG1.1 silicon ? > > > > > http://focus.ti.com/lit/er/sprz011j/sprz011j.pdf > Section 1.2 Revision Identifiaction > > Also, in CCS setup you should be using > "C64xx Rev 1.1 XDS5x0......." > > /Regards, P Ligander > > >Pls clarify. The C6x series is more exiting with it's uncaomparable > >features. But As a biginner I do have some difficulties in getting alonmg > >with C6416. Can any one send me any tutorial/Workshop material/ > or any good > >pdfs on these. Now I am exploring the examples of the CCS studio. > > Thanks once again. Ur suggestions are very important to me... > > > >Shyju P.V > >ERDCI > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "P Ligander" <> > >To: "Shyju" <> > >Cc: <> > >Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:37 AM > >Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem > > > > > > > > > >>Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... > >> > >>/Regards, P Ligander > >> > >>Shyju wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hello friends , > >>> I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 and > >>> > >>> > >c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described > it here. Hope > >any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... > > > > > >>> I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer > >>> > >>> > >version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 from > >Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the > tutorial section of > >CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS > >details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either > we have to > >put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform the > >step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create > a Channel > >for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB and > >our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no > TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However > >these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting > EXE graph and > >other things while the target is running.. We think the problem > is with the > >6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the > very purpose > >of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious > problem as far > >as we are concerned.Pls! > > > > > >>> give us a clear answer to this . > >>> > >>>The programs we tried are... > >>>Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. > >>> > >>>Doubts are.. > >>>1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it > >>> > >>> > >through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target > for the data > >transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) > > > > > >>>2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code which > >>> > >>> > >demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) > > > > > >>>Best Regards, > >>> > >>>"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, > >>>Jr. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>______________________________________ > >>>Scanned and protected by Email scanner > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>_____________________________________ > >>>Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only > the author > >>> > >>> > >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a > "reply all" if > >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > > > > >>>_____________________________________ > >>>About this discussion group: > >>> > >>>To Join: Send an email to > >>> > >>>To Post: Send an email to > >>> > >>>To Leave: Send an email to > >>> > >>>Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >>> > >>>Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > >>> > >>> > >>>">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>_____________________________________ > >>Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author > >> > >> > >of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a > "reply all" if > >you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > > > > > >>_____________________________________ > >>About this discussion group: > >> > >>To Join: Send an email to > >> > >>To Post: Send an email to > >> > >>To Leave: Send an email to > >> > >>Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >> > >>Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com > >> > >> > >>">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> >> >> > >______________________________________ >Scanned and protected by Email scanner >_____________________________________ >Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. > >_____________________________________ >About this discussion group: > >To Join: Send an email to > >To Post: Send an email to > >To Leave: Send an email to > >Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x > >Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com >">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > _____________________________________ Note: If you do a simple "reply" with your email client, only the author of this message will receive your answer. You need to do a "reply all" if you want your answer to be distributed to the entire group. _____________________________________ About this discussion group: To Join: Send an email to To Post: Send an email to To Leave: Send an email to Archives: http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/c6x Other Groups: http://www.dsprelated.com ">http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
Also, FYI a call to CSL function CHIP_getRevId() will do the trick. The hardware way (below) is much simpler ! - Andrew E. At 10:22 AM 6/6/2003 +0200, Jean-Michel MERCIER wrote: >2 ways to identifiy silicon revision > >- The software way : > * If you are using CCS 2.1x, then it is a 1.0x silicon revision > * If you are using CCS 2.2x, you have a different driver > for v1.0x and v1.1. So as said by Par, depending on which > driver works for you, you will now the revision > >- The hardware way : it is simply written on > the DSP > The 1st line of the DSP should be something like TMS320C6415GLZ > The 2nd line should be D103 - <numbers> > This is a 1.03 silicon > v1.1 silicon have <letter>11 marking at the start of the 2nd line > Jean-Michel MERCIER > >-- >dsp & imaging - www.ateme.com >ATEME - 26 Burospace - 91573 BIEVRES > > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Par Ligander [mailto:] >> Envoy: vendredi 6 juin 2003 08:31 >> : Shyju >> Cc : ; >> Objet : Re: [c6x] RTDX problem >> >> >> Shyju wrote: >> >> >Thanks for the fast response from P Ligander & Jeff Brower >> >I have tried RTDX in 6416 TEB from TI and also the board we >> designed using >> >C6416( Part no TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3).How do I know the core is >> PG1.1 silicon ? >> > >> > >> http://focus.ti.com/lit/er/sprz011j/sprz011j.pdf >> Section 1.2 Revision Identifiaction >> >> Also, in CCS setup you should be using >> "C64xx Rev 1.1 XDS5x0......." >> >> /Regards, P Ligander >> >> >Pls clarify. The C6x series is more exiting with it's uncaomparable >> >features. But As a biginner I do have some difficulties in getting alonmg >> >with C6416. Can any one send me any tutorial/Workshop material/ >> or any good >> >pdfs on these. Now I am exploring the examples of the CCS studio. >> > Thanks once again. Ur suggestions are very important to me... >> > >> >Shyju P.V >> >ERDCI >> > >> >----- Original Message ----- >> >From: "P Ligander" <> >> >To: "Shyju" <> >> >Cc: <> >> >Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:37 AM >> >Subject: Re: [c6x] RTDX problem >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >>Are you using PG1.1 silicon ? It is requiered for RTDX... >> >> >> >>/Regards, P Ligander >> >> >> >>Shyju wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>Hello friends , >> >>> I am new to C6x as well as to this group. I am working on c6416 and >> >>> >> >>> >> >c6201 of TI with CCS 2.2.I had few prblem and I have described >> it here. Hope >> >any one will answer my questions. A hi to all the group members.... >> > >> > >> >>> I have tried our programs in TMS3206416 TEB with code composer >> >>> >> >>> >> >version 2.2. I have downloaded the drivers of XDS510PP for CCS 2.2 from >> >Spectrum Digital's website. We tried the programs in the >> tutorial section of >> >CCS. Even if they are working fine we can not see the EXE graph , STS >> >details and LOG in real time. For seeing all those things either >> we have to >> >put a break point on the loop of execution or else we have to perform the >> >step through. Although in the Volume 4 example we can not create >> a Channel >> >for real time data transfer with target. We have tried this in TI TEB and >> >our board which uses the TMS3206416 DSP (Part no >> TMS32C6416DGLZ6E3). However >> >these programs are working in the 6201 TEB and we are getting >> EXE graph and >> >other things while the target is running.. We think the problem >> is with the >> >6416 chip. If we put break point in our program it spoils the >> very purpose >> >of RTDX. Since our design is based on C6416 it is a serious >> problem as far >> >as we are concerned.Pls! >> > >> > >> >>> give us a clear answer to this . >> >>> >> >>>The programs we tried are... >> >>>Volume 1, 2,3,4 of the tutorial folder of CCS. >> >>> >> >>>Doubts are.. >> >>>1. In order to get the data from C6416 is it mandatory to pass it >> >>> >> >>> >> >through the break point.(Remember break point halts the target >> for the data >> >transfer to the host and refreshing all the windows related to CCS) >> > >> > >> >>>2. If RTDX is possible with C6416 can anyone gimme a simple code which > >> >>> >> >>> >> >demonstrate the same.( Both host side and target side) >> > >> > >> >>>Best Regards, >> >>> >> >>>"You are not beaten until you admit it." -- George S. Patton, >> >>>Jr. >> >>> |
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
Henrry- > > For reliable high-speed real-time data transfer, suggest to use a > > DSK board and HPI > > I am using DSK6711 and using HPI to communicate each other. The > speed of taking image from DSK is quite fast but is not so > convienient for us to use the HPI. I have seen the TI solution offer > XDS new version which is XDS560. We have plan to buy the XDS560. Do > anyone have any experience with XDS560 while using for DSK6711 ? > is XDS560 very usefull for debugger proces ? My constraint to use > XDS560 is for debug the image for real time video application. XDS560 should be faster, definitely. I know that TI has been concentrating on improving RTDX speed, a major objective of their Tools Group. But to capture images in real-time? That won't be easy no matter how you do it, RTDX, HPI, or otherwise. At what bitrate? Jeff Brower system engineer Signalogic |
|
Reply by ●June 6, 20032003-06-06
> > XDS560 should be faster, definitely. I know that TI > has been concentrating on > improving RTDX speed, a major objective of their > Tools Group. > > But to capture images in real-time? That won't be > easy no matter how you do it, > RTDX, HPI, or otherwise. At what bitrate? > > Jeff Brower > system engineer > Signalogic Yeah, I aggree with you that XDS560 will also be faster as the TI claim for this product. I have seen XDS demo movie for the XDS560, this demo movie is demonstrating the XDS560 with DSK6711 and Daughter Card to capture image from WebCam and send to the Tv. In that demo, the picture that display in the tv was playing smoothly. But the movie doesnt explain how the image capture from web cam and display in tv. In my application is quite similiar which will capture image from CMOS Sensor for playing video. So I just want to make sure if i using code composer v.2.1(code composer that distributed together with DSK6711) and XDS560 could play the image data for real time .. So I could make sure that the data that coming to my board from CMOS sensor is correct. thx henrry ===== __________________________________ |