Technical discussions related to Audio Signal Processing (digital effects, acoustics, noise reduction, musical signal processing, etc).
Hi! I've been working with a 6713DSK but realized that the delay introduced by the codec is far to large (about 1.25 ms @ 22.05 ksps). I'm trying to find a developer kit (doesn't care about manufacturer) that uses a codec/ADC-DAC which doesn't introduce more than, say, 0.5- 1 ms delay. I guess this implies a SAR-ADC instead of a Sigma-Delta approach. However, finding a complete developer kit with this type of codec seems to be hard. Does anyone have any suggestions? Best regards, /Nils
Nils- > I've been working with a 6713DSK but realized that the delay > introduced by the codec is far to large (about 1.25 ms @ 22.05 ksps). > I'm trying to find a developer kit (doesn't care about manufacturer) > that uses a codec/ADC-DAC which doesn't introduce more than, say, 0.5- > 1 ms delay. I guess this implies a SAR-ADC instead of a Sigma-Delta > approach. However, finding a complete developer kit with this type of > codec seems to be hard. Does anyone have any suggestions? Maybe try one of the daughtercards available for 6713 DSK: http://focus.ti.com/dsp/docs/dspsupporttoolssoftwareaut.tsp?sectionId=3&tabId=466&toolT ypeId=48&familyId=132 Note that "daughter cards" from Pentek, Innovative, Surf, Signatec, and a few others are actually PMC or other form-factor modules that do not mate with DSK boards (have no idea how they got on this page, which says "...connect with TI DSP Starter Kits (DSKs)..."). -Jeff
Even using a non-oversampled SAR-based ADC doesn't guarantee low latency.. Unless you oversample, the SAR-based ADC will require a front end low pass filter with a steep rolloff approaching FS/2. Along with the steep rolloff comes a bump in the group delay near or at the LPF corner frequency. Before committing to this course, get data for group delay from the vendor or design references. Chris Jeff Brower wrote: > Nils- > > >> I've been working with a 6713DSK but realized that the delay >> introduced by the codec is far to large (about 1.25 ms @ 22.05 ksps). >> I'm trying to find a developer kit (doesn't care about manufacturer) >> that uses a codec/ADC-DAC which doesn't introduce more than, say, 0.5- >> 1 ms delay. I guess this implies a SAR-ADC instead of a Sigma-Delta >> approach. However, finding a complete developer kit with this type of >> codec seems to be hard. Does anyone have any suggestions? >> > > Maybe try one of the daughtercards available for 6713 DSK: > > > http://focus.ti.com/dsp/docs/dspsupporttoolssoftwareaut.tsp?sectionId=3&tabId=466&toolT ypeId=48&familyId=132 > > Note that "daughter cards" from Pentek, Innovative, Surf, Signatec, and a few others > are actually PMC or other form-factor modules that do not mate with DSK boards (have > no idea how they got on this page, which says "...connect with TI DSP Starter Kits > (DSKs)..."). > > -Jeff >